- Remove the current class from the content27_link item as Webflows native current state will automatically be applied.
- To add interactions which automatically expand and collapse sections in the table of contents select the content27_h-trigger element, add an element trigger and select Mouse click (tap)
- For the 1st click select the custom animation Content 27 table of contents [Expand] and for the 2nd click select the custom animation Content 27 table of contents [Collapse].
- In the Trigger Settings, deselect all checkboxes other than Desktop and above. This disables the interaction on tablet and below to prevent bugs when scrolling.
The global wellness industry is a staggering ecosystem built on the premise of self-improvement and optimization. Over the last decade, this movement has been fundamentally reshaped by wearable technology, transitioning from passive activity tracking to active biometric monitoring.
Today, technology in a wide variety of form factors (rings, watches, wristbands, chest straps, and even mattress pads) exists to monitor biometric data. Driven by the quantified self and biohacking communities, wearables have successfully integrated into the fabric of daily health. They have demystified sleep cycles, digitized fitness routines, and made metrics like Resting Heart Rate (RHR) and Heart Rate Variability (HRV) household concepts. This revolution established the foundation that allowed ordinary people to quantify, measure, and optimize their personal health.
The Limits of Proxy Data
Despite this progress, the physiological wearable market has one limitation. The core challenge is one of proxies.
Current technology is brilliant at measuring the body’s outputs—the heart’s rhythm, the skin’s temperature, the body’s movement—but it can only infer the state of the central nervous system. A device can tell you your HRV is low, suggesting poor readiness, but it cannot tell you why your brain is fatigued. When you hit the wall of burnout, traditional wearables register the result (a spiking heart rate), not the cause (accumulated cognitive load).
This highlights the need for quantifying the actual source of performance: the brain. To ignore the brain is to ignore the command center of the system. True holistic wellness is impossible without data on the body’s most critical organ.
Where Neurotechnology Intervenes
This is where wearable neurotechnology enters the wellness landscape.
Neurotech bypasses the body's proxies to measure brain activity directly. By monitoring electrical activity from the brain, neurotech (specifically, brain-computer interface devices with EEG technology) can accurately quantify mental states that were previously subjective and invisible.
This direct insight is already changing how we approach self-care:
- Objective Recovery: Metrics like Mental Recovery provide an objective, data-driven answer to the question of daily cognitive mental readiness. It gives users the agency to manage their energy reserves and approach their most demanding tasks with clarity.
- Strain Management: Tracking Cognitive Strain allows users to see, in real-time, how mentally strenuous different tasks are. This data provides the power to head off burnout before it begins to manifest physically.
- Resilience Building: Advanced metrics quantifying Anxiety Resilience offer a measurable path toward building a more robust and adaptive system for handling stress.
The Future of Personalized Wellness
The integration of neurotech and wearables signals a new era of truly personalized and preventative wellness. The future of wearables is not about tracking more steps; it’s about synthesizing a complete mind-body profile.
Imagine a single dashboard that coordinates your recovery protocol: a low Mental Recovery score (from your BCI device) triggers an alert to reduce extra distractions (blocking off recovery time in your calendar), while simultaneously suggesting a low-intensity workout (informed by your RHR and fitness history). With wearable neurotechnology, this can be the new reality.
By incorporating the brain, wearable technology will no longer be limited to tracking health history—it will become the essential tool for optimizing human potential and proactively shaping cognitive longevity.
2 Distraction Stroop Tasks experiment: The Stroop Effect (also known as cognitive interference) is a psychological phenomenon describing the difficulty people have naming a color when it's used to spell the name of a different color. During each trial of this experiment, we flashed the words “Red” or “Yellow” on a screen. Participants were asked to respond to the color of the words and ignore their meaning by pressing four keys on the keyboard –– “D”, “F”, “J”, and “K,” -- which were mapped to “Red,” “Green,” “Blue,” and “Yellow” colors, respectively. Trials in the Stroop task were categorized into congruent, when the text content matched the text color (e.g. Red), and incongruent, when the text content did not match the text color (e.g., Red). The incongruent case was counter-intuitive and more difficult. We expected to see lower accuracy, higher response times, and a drop in Alpha band power in incongruent trials. To mimic the chaotic distraction environment of in-person office life, we added an additional layer of complexity by floating the words on different visual backgrounds (a calm river, a roller coaster, a calm beach, and a busy marketplace). Both the behavioral and neural data we collected showed consistently different results in incongruent tasks, such as longer reaction times and lower Alpha waves, particularly when the words appeared on top of the marketplace background, the most distracting scene.
Interruption by Notification: It’s widely known that push notifications decrease focus level. In our three Interruption by Notification experiments, participants performed the Stroop Tasks, above, with and without push notifications, which consisted of a sound played at random time followed by a prompt to complete an activity. Our behavioral analysis and focus metrics showed that, on average, participants presented slower reaction times and were less accurate during blocks of time with distractions compared to those without them.
